About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
Blog Article
five. Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General in addition to counsel for that complainant further argued that during the investigation from the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led to the recovery of sleeping products on fourteen.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has been created before the Court wherein the sleeping drugs were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected within the liver although not within the abdomen. Therefore, the recovery of claimed sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General and also counsel for your complainant have also argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Bhoora led into the recovery of the motorcycle.
Whilst the punishment could be severe, its purpose isn't solely to seek vengeance but to prevent opportunity offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fire-arm injury which was fatal to your deceased was caused by the petitioner but in support of opinion with the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is obtainable about the file and mere ipsi dixit of police isn't binding around the Court.
Deterrence: The fear of severe outcomes, such as capital punishment, is meant to deter opportunity criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is very important in reducing the prevalence of intentional killings.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala and also the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade from the accused has not been conducted but. In the moment case, now the accused made an effort to get advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image from the petitioner was greatly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity of the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance into the accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly with the witness to establish the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and made images. Moreover, the images shown within the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity until finally he was place up for an identification parade. Making pictures on the accused publically, possibly by showing the same towards the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or program, would create doubt during the proceedings of your identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make certain that there is no prospect for your witness to see the accused before going on the identification parade. The accused should not be shown to the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the push or electronic media. Provided the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
The recent amendment to Section 489-File on the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the legislation with contemporary challenges.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may be just one or more judgments offered (or reported). Only the reason for the decision with the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted within an argument.
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders maintaining in view that on the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out with the counsel for your respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more
after release from the website jail he shed interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners might request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done In case the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were perfectly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Except if case is attempted(Bail Matters)
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, along with the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally identified conviction. Read more
one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These include things like if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.